Caledonian Brewery

Posted on: June 7, 2024

Considerable potential as an attractive and liveable residential community

Considerable potential as an attractive and liveable residential community

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association supports this application.
This application was the subject of a recent presentation to our Policy and Development Committee  by the development team and the proposals were well received  by our committee members.
In our view this is a good scheme which demonstrates the successful and sustainable reuse of a range of heritage buildings for residential purposes and the sensitive infill of the remaining site with new or rebuilt accommodation.  It has considerable potential as an attractive and liveable residential community.
However, it is disappointing that little information is  provided relating to affordable or accessible housing provision or  accessible parking provision.  It is to be hoped that this oversight is addressed.

Former Royal High School proposals win Cockburn support

Posted on: May 17, 2024

The Association supports proposals to refurbish and repurpose the former Royal High School into a National Centre for Music.

The Association supports proposals to refurbish and repurpose the former Royal High School into a National Centre for Music.

Cockburn Response

The Association has examined the planning and listed building consent applications by the Royal High School Preservation Trust for the repurposing and refurbishment of the former Royal High School.  We have recollected our substantial history of engagement with this iconic structure, acknowledged as the one of the finest Greek Revival building in the world, more than justifying its Category A-listing.  We have also benefited from a detailed site visit with the applicant and architects, when we were able to assess the internal changes as well as external.

The Association supports the proposals to form new premises for the National Centre for Music including music rehearsal and performance spaces, licensed cafe /restaurant and bar facilities, offices, internal and external alterations, landscaping, public realm including provision of external multi-use space for temporary events/festival uses.

We agree with the assessment of Historic Environment Scotland that the proposals would return the main building closer to its original solitary setting on the site.  The loss of most of the later buildings will enable the Hamilton building to have greater visual clarity in its landscape setting with Calton Hill.  We particular welcome the new landscape structure which provides new pleasure grounds and event spaces around the main building.  This will have a both a positive impact on the setting of this A-listed building as well as enhancing the character of this part of the Conservation Area.

The reduction in scope of the proposals from both the failed hotel schemes and the abandoned Music School scheme results in much “lighter touch” internal changes.  We are particularly supportive of the use of existing lower spaces rather than previous ideas which involved significant (and expensive) alterations.   Additionally, we accept the interventions to facilitate barrier free access – such as the new openings proposed for the east and west pavilions.

Finally, the opening up and access to the previously hidden belvedere/clock tower at the south-east corner is a welcome outcome.

For the sake of clarity, we note the changes in level proposed at the Western pavilion end, but feel that these are proportionate in order to facilitate the wider and more flexible use of proposed new facilities.  Bringing otherwise hidden areas of landscape around the building into active use is also supportable.

In summary, we welcome these proposals, believing that they result in a suitable reuse but in a manner which reinforces the essential heritage value of the site, rather than detracting from it.

 

Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030

Posted on: May 3, 2024

Monitoring and Evaluation  is essential for ensuring that actions are effective, efficient, and accountable

Monitoring and Evaluation  is essential for ensuring that actions are effective, efficient, and accountable

Cockburn Response

Consultation Comments

Background

Over the past twenty years or so the City of Edinburgh Council, in conjunction with many formal and informal partners, has brought forward or enacted many sustainable development  and climate change related strategies, policies, action plans and initiatives.  These all built upon similar strategies prepared by the former District Council and Lothian Regional Council, notably including  the Agenda 21 initiative, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.

Many of these earlier strategies and plans, including the recent 2016 to 2020 Edinburgh Adapts Plan, have addressed climate change adaptation to a greater or lesser extent.  It would have been helpful and instructive if this latest Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 had clearly illustrated how it intends to build on the success of previous adaptation  plans and initiatives and how it will work to rectify any past failures and so ensure  a positive and effective contribution to citywide adaptation going forward.

The Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 signposts to some other citywide strategies and plans that as relevant to climate adaptation. However, the city has many economic, social, and environmental strategies, plans and action plans which have some relevance to citywide climate adaptation. In view of this complex policy landscape, the draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024 requires a much clearer indication of where  it sits in  relation the city’s policy hierarchy and what authority it has in relation to other approved plans. This must  include local and national land use planning policies and guidance that can serve as aa exchange for climate related mitigationadaptation, and sustainable development objectives.  We agree, for  example, with RIBA’s an ICE’s recent policy position that demolition of existing building should not be allowed in all but the most extreme circumstances. This represents a considerable saving in terms of embedded carbon but may require careful and considered adaptation interventions thereafter to ensure climate resilience in retained buildings.

Edinburgh’s 2030 Climate Strategy,  which sets out a city-wide approach to reducing greenhouse gases in Edinburgh,  to deliver a net zero, climate ready city by 2030 is mentioned. However, it is important to note that mitigation initiatives aimed at reducing carbon emissions can also have additional climate resilience benefits. Mitigation and adaptation strategies should be complementary to maximise their climate change impact. Therefore, it is important that they are integrated to avoid wasteful and unnecessary policy conflicts and make the best use of all available resources.  More clarity on how the 2030 Climate Strategy and the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 complement each other would be helpful.

As the IPCC made clear in a recent report: “Many adaptation and mitigation options can help address climate change, but no single option is sufficient by itself. Effective implementation depends on policies and cooperation at all scales and can be enhanced through integrated responses that link mitigation and adaptation.”

In addition, community-based climate activities have built momentum in relation to practical adaptation actions over an extended period.  The draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024 should acknowledge this invaluable contribution to adapting Edinburgh to a changing climate. The Edinburgh Adapts Partnership has an opportunity to engage with and integrate into Edinburgh’s communities of place and of interest to ensure that community interest is at the heart of its decision making and governance processes.

Vision and Priorities

We are supportive of the Vision and Priorities identified in the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030.  In any case, these have generally  been embedded in many the city’s existing visions, strategies, and action plans  already. However, as previously indicated, although the draft plan signposts to some of the wider policy context in which the plan will operate, it fails to explain how exactly how this plan will be integrate with existing large and diverse range of relevant policies and related activities and whether it has any  authority within this large policy ecosystem. More importantly, it does not articulate what is new and value added in  the draft plan over and above initiatives which are committed elsewhere.

We believe that effective and meaningful monitoring and evaluation are key factors in achieving real climate adaptation and are critical to demonstrate effectiveness and accountability and the best use of resources.  We acknowledge that there are challenges associated with monitoring and evaluation of climate adaptation, related to the long timescales of climate change and its impacts. However, many of the actions listed in the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 are clearly suitable  for short-term monitoring and evaluation. This deficit should be rectified before the draft plan is approved.

The Case for Adaptation and Climate Ready Edinburgh

These two sections provide a useful introduction to Edinburgh’s changing climate and  to what needs to be done to successfully adapt to these changes. However, both are too brief.  The Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 needs to articulate in a more inclusive way what the challenges of Edinburgh’s changing climate might look like. An obvious way to do this would be through the inclusion of case studies based on actual past events and through illustrative projections of what climate risk might look like on the ground across the city in the future.   This section should be a springboard for the rest of the plan and should set out a clear indicative illustration of the key features which Edinburgh should aspire to as a well-adapted city in the future. It simply fails to do this and requires a thorough reworking.

Climate Ready Edinburgh Action Plan and Implementation Plan

At first sight, these plans seem thorough and comprehensive. But a closer reading reveals many points of real concern which beg the question of how real, relevant, and meaningful the content of Action Plan and Implementation Plans is. Some of the proposed actions are so broad and nebulous that they are almost meaningless.

It must be acknowledged that many of the actions listed in Implementation Plan are of value. But an overarching lack of specificity means that almost any activity, large or small, could be counted as addressing the actions listed  here.  A SMART action plan incorporates 5 characteristics of a goal: specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-based.  These characteristics are not comprehensively achieved in the draft.

We would like to see:

  • Specific actions to increase the climate resilience of city-wide built heritage
  • Greater clarity and urgency on what is being done to counter storm events and flooding
  • More specific and tangible action to  the challenges of sea-level rise
  • Specific interventions to address heat and storm event impacts on public transport, road, and active travel
  • More pro-active action to secure a biodiversity-rich future environment for Edinburgh
  • Pro-active selection of more suitable tree species to safeguard the city’s greenspace and streets
  • Early engagement with the increased day-to-day maintenance burden of greenspaces, parks, and street trees
  • Fuller articulation and stakeholder engagement on the impact of climate change on the local economy, both positive and negatively
  • A much greater degree of participation by residents and other stakeholders at an early stage of the detailed design and implementation of the proposed actions
  • An equal role for residents in the proposed review group and in the identification of key indicators of success
  • Greater transparency on which actions are fully funded and committed
  • Greater transparency on how the draft plan adds value to ongoing activities which are not directly driven by a climate adaptation agenda

Meaningful Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and Evaluation is given a passing mention in the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030   but is essentially  absent.  A draft Monitoring and Evaluation process for comprehensively assessing the performance and effectiveness of the actions contain in the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030   should have been presented as part of the current consulting  . This process must  require  the collection and objective analysis of the plan’s activities, outputs, outcomes, and impacts to determine whether the desired results have been achieved.

Monitoring and Evaluation  is essential for ensuring that actions are effective, efficient, and accountable. By monitoring and evaluating the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030, the Edinburgh Adapts Partnership  and citywide stakeholders and funders can identify successes, challenges and failures and so make informed decisions to improve future  plans, outcomes, and impacts.

There is no need to delay the presentation of  Monitoring and Evaluation framework with key measures of success for Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030. This work does not need to originated from scratch.  The largely generic content of the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030  means that similar plans with approved   Monitoring and Evaluation frameworks can readily form the basis of a suitable framework for the Edinburgh Adapts Partnership.  Presenting such a framework now, before the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030   is approved is highly desirable and will ensure timely monitoring of the plans process.

Role of Residents

We believe that residents need a much greater involvement in Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 at all levels, from governance to action on the ground. The plan and the Edinburgh Adapts Partnership should empower residents, communities, and business stakeholders  to identify climate impacts, and to discuss interventions to adapt to them. This will lead  to a better awareness of, engagement with  and preparedness for future climate change events across the city and help build a common understanding and ownership of climate adaptation plans and actions, which is key to their successful delivery. As the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 is rolled out, inclusive community engagement should be supported. In part this might be achieved through an online community engagement platform to facilitate the review of ongoing actions and the working up of new actions. However, real world engagement is also required to access traditionally unheard voices and groups. “Think globally, act locally” was a core principle of Local Agenda 21 which aimed to inspire local authorities, their partners, and citizens to work towards sustainable development. The same principle is applicable to the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030.

 

Mortonhall

Posted on:

Edinburgh’s Greenbelt is part of the character of the city.

Edinburgh’s Greenbelt is part of the character of the city.

Cockburn Response

As an organisation the Cockburn Association works to promote the conservation and enhancement of both Edinburgh’s landscape and its historical and architectural heritage. It has a long history of campaigning and intervention when the plans of central and local government and those of private developers threaten the unique character of the city.

Edinburgh’s Greenbelt is such an issue, and the organisation has consistently monitored its evolution from its implementation in 1957 to the present day. Our interventions and constructive comments have inevitably occurred mainly when areas of land designated as greenbelt have been eroded and thereby considerably reduced in size.

In this context  we do not support this application.  However, we look forward to discussing the details of this  proposed development with members of the development team in due course.

Finance House

Posted on: April 28, 2024

In our view the approved residential redevelopment should go ahead

In our view the approved residential redevelopment should go ahead

Cockburn Response

We do not support this application.

This former office block has already achieved planning permission  for part change of use and part redevelopment to mainstream residential use.  In our view this approved redevelopment should go ahead.

In November 2023, Councillors during a Full Council meeting in Edinburgh overwhelmingly voted to recognise and seek to address the scale of Edinburgh’s housing crisis by officially declaring a Housing Emergency.

In view of this declaration we believe that it would be inconsistent with this declaration for the Council to approve this new application.

Makars’ Court gazebo

Posted on: April 27, 2024

We understand that Makars’ Court is a Common Good asset

We understand that Makars’ Court is a Common Good asset

Cockburn Response

We object to this application which, in our view, represents the commercialisation of an important area of public space which provides heritage interest, amenity and access in the heart of the Old Town.  We cannot support this proposed change of use.

The City of Edinburgh Museums Service  describes Makars’ Court as ‘an evolving national monument’ with ‘famous words of great Scottish authors inscribed in the flagstones’.  This application does not support the court’s continuing development as al literary heritage asset.

We understand that Makars’ Court is a Common Good asset.  Under Part 8 of the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, Local Authorities as required to carry out a consultation exercise when seeking to change the use, or sell, any properties forming part of the Common Good. This application includes an area of commercial space and represents a change of use, in our view, and, as such, representation should have been sought on this proposal through an appropriate consultation. exercise in the terms of the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015 .

Proposed Student Accommodation Dunedin Street (Revised)

Posted on: April 19, 2024

An opportunity to engage residents in the preparation of a Local Place Plan

An opportunity to engage residents in the preparation of a Local Place Plan

Cockburn Response

We acknowledge that this revised application seeks to address issues of concern raised in relation to the original, similar application on this site including overdevelopment, lack of sympathy with local built character, lack of internal/external amenity space, lack of private/public greenspace, poor integration of waste and recycling facilities.
However, our comments in relation to the original application remain relevant.
This part of Edinburgh is in danger of being redeveloped through ad hoc market driven development.
There is an ideal opportunity here to engage residents in the preparation of a Local Place Plan to enable the local community to submit ideas and proposals for their own local area. Introduced by the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019, Local Place Plans are a way for communities to think about how to make their place better, to agree priorities, and to take action to make change happen.
In preparing their own community-led Local Place Plan, the local community in this part of Edinburgh could express its aspirations and priorities for the future through the submission of ideas and proposals for the development or use of land and buildings.
Once registered, the Local Place Plan could then be taken into account by The City of Edinburgh Council a material consideration when planning applications are being considered.

Mecca Bingo Hall Manderston Street

Posted on:

A new Edinburgh-wide  student needs assessment is now urgently required

A new Edinburgh-wide  student needs assessment is now urgently required

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association supports this application.

 

We acknowledge that this  is a constrained site with development challenges.  Bearing this in mind, PBSA redevelopment is an acceptable use of the site which will secure much of the remaining external heritage interest.

 

This former mill has been extensively modified over its history and most of its heritage features have been lost.  However,  we would ask that an effort be made to salvage any remaining  art deco features of interest either for reuse on site or for incorporation into other projects elsewhere.

 

We are generally supportive of PBSA developments which feature cluster flats in their design since these offer a better student living environment and are more likely to offer future opportunities for conversion to mainstream housing should market demand  for student housing diminish.

 

We are aware of local concerns regarding this and nearby student accommodation developments in the context of the city’s ongoing housing emergency.   It is now essential that the City of Edinburgh Council commissions an independent data-driven student needs assessment for Edinburgh  to inform the Council’s current and  future  planning  position on student housing needs in the City.

 

It is clear that Edinburgh has a significant and varied housing need  with many permanent and transitory residents facing real challenges  in their search for  suitable and affordable accommodation.  A growing student population runs the risk of exasperating an already difficult balance of housing needs and supply.

 

A new Edinburgh-wide  student needs assessment is now urgently required  to provide a robust evidence base from which consideration can be given to how to manage student accommodation now and in the future, including reviewing the threshold for the numbers of university students living outside of managed accommodation; and policies for the delivery of purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA).

Comments on World Heritage Management Plan 2024-2034

Posted on: April 15, 2024

There is a clear need for the final version of the Management Plan and Action Plan to have Key Performance Indicators and specific areas of action with expected outcomes and outputs.

There is a clear need for the final version of the Management Plan and Action Plan to have Key Performance Indicators and specific areas of action with expected outcomes and outputs.

Cockburn Response

The draft Management Plan now covers a period of 10 years versus the previous plan’s 5-year lifespan. We assume that this is to align with City Plan 2030 although there is no specific explanation for this change. It would be helpful if this were explained. A ten-year plan period could mean that there is little scope to respond to changes in policy or circumstance. However, the introduction of a two-year Action Plans is a pragmatic response to allow these concerns to be managed.

The draft Plan appears to be a roll-over of the existing plan. Given the issues and challenges that we set out in our full reponse, we question if this is entirely the right approach.

The Association agrees with and supports the aims of the draft Plan as set out in para. 2.2.  We also support the five themes set out in the Action Plan, being awareness and appreciation; climate emergency; conservation and maintenance; control & guidance; and a sustainable visitor experience.

In accepting the structure of a 10-year main Plan with a 2-year Action Plan, we would expect the latter to have SMART targets embedded in it. We would expect a final version of the Plan and Action Plan to have Key Performance Indicators and specific areas of action with expected outcomes and outputs.

Failed rainwater goods in the WHS.

The Management Plan must drive a data-driven approach to policy formulation and action-setting. This is currently missing in the draft Plans. We appreciate that a State of Conservation Report has been prepared, but its data must be used to inform the plan, influence its approach, and drive activities (with measurable targets).

Ratcliffe Terrace Demolition and PBSA Development

Posted on: April 13, 2024

The continued demolition of perfectly sound and usable buildings is simply unsupportable

The continued demolition of perfectly sound and usable buildings is simply unsupportable

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn objects this application.

The proposed demotion  of the current building on Ratcliffe Terrace cannot be justified.  This quirky,  distinctive and highly  original building is clearly suitable for continued use or  for imaginative conversion.  It is of some local heritage interest and  a valuable survivor of a Newington streetscape that has lost many similar features of interest and distinction over the years.  In the current climate emergency the continued demolition of perfectly sound and usable buildings such as this  is simply unsupportable.

We consider that the proposed six-storey purpose-built student residential development has nothing to recommend it.   It  is of a poor architectural design  whose  height, scale, bulk, massing, horizontal pattern and materiality are odds with the prevailing streetscape.   We question whether this proposal has appropriate levels of internal and external amenity space, external greenspace and adequate access and servicing arrangements.

The design of the proposed building seems to anticipate the potential for future expansion onto adjacent light industrial areas should these become available for redevelopment.

We also note local concerns regarding the increasing concentration of student accommodation  blocks in this area of the city.  These concerns underline the need  for objective, comprehensive and data-driven student needs assessments to accompany every PBSA application.