Fringe Hub

Posted on: July 18, 2024

There is broad stakeholder support for the redevelopment

There is broad stakeholder support for the redevelopment

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association agrees with the broad stakeholder support for the redevelopment of a B-listed building, aiming to create a centralized, modern, and accessible facility for the Fringe Society.

The removal of non-original extensions, the installation of energy efficient windows and the internal cladding of external walls are not of concern.

However, it is unclear whether DDA compliant accessible parking will be retained the remodeling of the former playground.  This  is a real concern given the effort being made to improve accessibility to and within the former resource centre and the lack of publicly accessible DDA compliant parking spaces  in the local area.

The layout of the playground, as proposed, is a lost opportunity to introduced more climate-ready greenspace into this part of the city.  Much more could be done in terms of low cost, low maintenance urban greening.

Moving forward, the modernization of heritage buildings poses numerous challenges. The Fringe Society must adopt best practices and innovative solutions to sustainably utilize their new headquarters. Striking a balance between modern requirements and the conservation of historical charm and ambiance necessitates meticulous planning and inventive strategies. Specifically, meeting energy efficiency standards affordably while preserving the building’s historical integrity will require innovative  methods, especially as the city broadens its low carbon energy infrastructure. Nevertheless, the Fringe Society is in an excellent position to set a precedent for the sustainable adaptation of historic buildings.

 

Inverleith Row Telecoms Mast

Posted on: July 12, 2024

Proposed telecommunications installation  in  a conservation area should be located in an inconspicuous location

Proposed telecommunications installation  in  a conservation area should be located in an inconspicuous location

Cockburn Response

Proposals for prominent telecommunications installations in conservation areas continue to come forward and generally result in  significant local concern regarding their siting and their potential negative impact on the character and amenity of  individual conservation areas.

Local planning authorities are under a duty to formulate and publish proposals for the preservation and enhancement of conservation areas . Policies need to be developed which clearly identify what it is about the character or appearance of the area which should be preserved or enhanced and the means of achieving that objective.

Given the frequency with which telecommunications  installations are proliferating across the city.  The need to clarify if, when and how such installations  can be sited within a conservation areas is urgent.

It is our view that such proposals  should not add to street clutter on busy pedestrian thoroughfares or in vicinity of  busy road  junctions.  Applications in conservation  areas should certainly be refused if it is determined that the benefits of the proposed installation are deemed not to outweigh the harm caused to the unique character  of the conservation area and if there is insufficient evidence that alternative sites or mast sharing opportunities have been adequately explored.

We understand the essential requirement for modern telecommunications infrastructure in our city and its importance to residents, visitors and businesses. However, we believe that, in consultation with local stakeholders, any  proposed telecommunications installation  in  a conservation area should be located in an inconspicuous location, dis-aggregated into smaller, less conspicuous arrays or co-located on an existing installation if this is achievable.

Granton Development

Posted on: July 11, 2024

More information is required on affordable housing

More information is required on affordable housing

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn supports this application.

Members of our Policy and Development Committee benefited from an in-depth presentation on this development by the development team during the consultation phase.

In relation to this planning application, in our view it is essential that community infrastructure is delivered in a timely manner in support of the planned residential development.

Surprisingly little information is provided in relation to the affordable housing component of this proposal. There is no affordable housing statement, only a broad statement of intent. As a result, it is unclear what specific housing needs are to be addressed and if affordable family homes are included, for example.

The proposed district heating scheme may be a viable, low carbon energy resource for future residents.  But it is not clear it this can be guaranteed to be an affordable option for future residents in the long term. More information on energy affordability is required.

Proposed Jesus The Homeless Sculpture

Posted on:

This sculpture has promoted public discourse on homelessness

This sculpture has promoted public discourse on homelessness

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn supports this application.

Many of the statues around the city centre are large and imposing and celebrate the lives and achievements of prominent citizens.. Jesus The Homeless is more down to earth and speaks of the fragility of the human condition.  It seems an  evocative and appropriate addition to the cityscape, especially in the current Housing Emergency.

Its proposed location is consistent with the positioning of duplicate statues in relation to prominent building and churches in other major cities.

Around the world, this sculpture has promoted public discourse on homelessness and motivated action towards its eradication. It is to be hoped that the same will be true in Edinburgh.

Princes Street Advertising

Posted on: June 28, 2024

We consider it highly likely that it have a negative impact

We consider it highly likely that it have a negative impact

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn objects to this application.

The proposed advertising will have an extremely prominent position in the World Heritage Site and Conservation Area.  It  will be in place for an extended period of time.

We accept that the proposed shrouding will incorporate an image of the building’s façade.  Nevertheless, given  the scale and prominence of the proposed advertising we consider it highly likely

that it have a negative impact on the perception and experience of  Edinburgh’s historic city centre and one of its most iconic streets by many visitors and tourists to the city.

Carlton Highland Hotel

Posted on: June 14, 2024

Significant and welcome improvements

Significant and welcome improvements

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn supports this application.

North Bridge is an important and high traffic thoroughfare. The proposed unification and upgrading of retail units along the hotel’s façade will result in a significant and welcome aesthetic improvement to the street.

The introduction of new retails units into Jeffrey Street is also to  Jeffrey Street is also welcome.  In addition to an aesthetic improvement, this should encourage more street activation and support pedestrian security along the street.

Filmhouse

Posted on:

All essential steps towards re-establishing this venue

All essential steps towards re-establishing this venue

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn supports this application associated with re-establishing Filmhouse.

The proposed improvements and essential internal maintenance projects  should make the Filmhouse a more comfortable, accessible and welcoming venue for people to come together to watch films and to talk about them.

Upgrading seating, improving movement across foyer areas and the building more generally, refurbishing  toilets, improving support for the less able and general redecoration are all essential steps towards re-establishing the Filmhouse after a difficult hiatus in its availability to Edinburgh residents and visitors.

 

 

 

Caledonian Brewery

Posted on: June 7, 2024

Considerable potential as an attractive and liveable residential community

Considerable potential as an attractive and liveable residential community

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association supports this application.
This application was the subject of a recent presentation to our Policy and Development Committee  by the development team and the proposals were well received  by our committee members.
In our view this is a good scheme which demonstrates the successful and sustainable reuse of a range of heritage buildings for residential purposes and the sensitive infill of the remaining site with new or rebuilt accommodation.  It has considerable potential as an attractive and liveable residential community.
However, it is disappointing that little information is  provided relating to affordable or accessible housing provision or  accessible parking provision.  It is to be hoped that this oversight is addressed.

Former Royal High School proposals win Cockburn support

Posted on: May 17, 2024

The Association supports proposals to refurbish and repurpose the former Royal High School into a National Centre for Music.

The Association supports proposals to refurbish and repurpose the former Royal High School into a National Centre for Music.

Cockburn Response

The Association has examined the planning and listed building consent applications by the Royal High School Preservation Trust for the repurposing and refurbishment of the former Royal High School.  We have recollected our substantial history of engagement with this iconic structure, acknowledged as the one of the finest Greek Revival building in the world, more than justifying its Category A-listing.  We have also benefited from a detailed site visit with the applicant and architects, when we were able to assess the internal changes as well as external.

The Association supports the proposals to form new premises for the National Centre for Music including music rehearsal and performance spaces, licensed cafe /restaurant and bar facilities, offices, internal and external alterations, landscaping, public realm including provision of external multi-use space for temporary events/festival uses.

We agree with the assessment of Historic Environment Scotland that the proposals would return the main building closer to its original solitary setting on the site.  The loss of most of the later buildings will enable the Hamilton building to have greater visual clarity in its landscape setting with Calton Hill.  We particular welcome the new landscape structure which provides new pleasure grounds and event spaces around the main building.  This will have a both a positive impact on the setting of this A-listed building as well as enhancing the character of this part of the Conservation Area.

The reduction in scope of the proposals from both the failed hotel schemes and the abandoned Music School scheme results in much “lighter touch” internal changes.  We are particularly supportive of the use of existing lower spaces rather than previous ideas which involved significant (and expensive) alterations.   Additionally, we accept the interventions to facilitate barrier free access – such as the new openings proposed for the east and west pavilions.

Finally, the opening up and access to the previously hidden belvedere/clock tower at the south-east corner is a welcome outcome.

For the sake of clarity, we note the changes in level proposed at the Western pavilion end, but feel that these are proportionate in order to facilitate the wider and more flexible use of proposed new facilities.  Bringing otherwise hidden areas of landscape around the building into active use is also supportable.

In summary, we welcome these proposals, believing that they result in a suitable reuse but in a manner which reinforces the essential heritage value of the site, rather than detracting from it.

 

Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030

Posted on: May 3, 2024

Monitoring and Evaluation  is essential for ensuring that actions are effective, efficient, and accountable

Monitoring and Evaluation  is essential for ensuring that actions are effective, efficient, and accountable

Cockburn Response

Consultation Comments

Background

Over the past twenty years or so the City of Edinburgh Council, in conjunction with many formal and informal partners, has brought forward or enacted many sustainable development  and climate change related strategies, policies, action plans and initiatives.  These all built upon similar strategies prepared by the former District Council and Lothian Regional Council, notably including  the Agenda 21 initiative, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.

Many of these earlier strategies and plans, including the recent 2016 to 2020 Edinburgh Adapts Plan, have addressed climate change adaptation to a greater or lesser extent.  It would have been helpful and instructive if this latest Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 had clearly illustrated how it intends to build on the success of previous adaptation  plans and initiatives and how it will work to rectify any past failures and so ensure  a positive and effective contribution to citywide adaptation going forward.

The Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 signposts to some other citywide strategies and plans that as relevant to climate adaptation. However, the city has many economic, social, and environmental strategies, plans and action plans which have some relevance to citywide climate adaptation. In view of this complex policy landscape, the draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024 requires a much clearer indication of where  it sits in  relation the city’s policy hierarchy and what authority it has in relation to other approved plans. This must  include local and national land use planning policies and guidance that can serve as aa exchange for climate related mitigationadaptation, and sustainable development objectives.  We agree, for  example, with RIBA’s an ICE’s recent policy position that demolition of existing building should not be allowed in all but the most extreme circumstances. This represents a considerable saving in terms of embedded carbon but may require careful and considered adaptation interventions thereafter to ensure climate resilience in retained buildings.

Edinburgh’s 2030 Climate Strategy,  which sets out a city-wide approach to reducing greenhouse gases in Edinburgh,  to deliver a net zero, climate ready city by 2030 is mentioned. However, it is important to note that mitigation initiatives aimed at reducing carbon emissions can also have additional climate resilience benefits. Mitigation and adaptation strategies should be complementary to maximise their climate change impact. Therefore, it is important that they are integrated to avoid wasteful and unnecessary policy conflicts and make the best use of all available resources.  More clarity on how the 2030 Climate Strategy and the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 complement each other would be helpful.

As the IPCC made clear in a recent report: “Many adaptation and mitigation options can help address climate change, but no single option is sufficient by itself. Effective implementation depends on policies and cooperation at all scales and can be enhanced through integrated responses that link mitigation and adaptation.”

In addition, community-based climate activities have built momentum in relation to practical adaptation actions over an extended period.  The draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024 should acknowledge this invaluable contribution to adapting Edinburgh to a changing climate. The Edinburgh Adapts Partnership has an opportunity to engage with and integrate into Edinburgh’s communities of place and of interest to ensure that community interest is at the heart of its decision making and governance processes.

Vision and Priorities

We are supportive of the Vision and Priorities identified in the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030.  In any case, these have generally  been embedded in many the city’s existing visions, strategies, and action plans  already. However, as previously indicated, although the draft plan signposts to some of the wider policy context in which the plan will operate, it fails to explain how exactly how this plan will be integrate with existing large and diverse range of relevant policies and related activities and whether it has any  authority within this large policy ecosystem. More importantly, it does not articulate what is new and value added in  the draft plan over and above initiatives which are committed elsewhere.

We believe that effective and meaningful monitoring and evaluation are key factors in achieving real climate adaptation and are critical to demonstrate effectiveness and accountability and the best use of resources.  We acknowledge that there are challenges associated with monitoring and evaluation of climate adaptation, related to the long timescales of climate change and its impacts. However, many of the actions listed in the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 are clearly suitable  for short-term monitoring and evaluation. This deficit should be rectified before the draft plan is approved.

The Case for Adaptation and Climate Ready Edinburgh

These two sections provide a useful introduction to Edinburgh’s changing climate and  to what needs to be done to successfully adapt to these changes. However, both are too brief.  The Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 needs to articulate in a more inclusive way what the challenges of Edinburgh’s changing climate might look like. An obvious way to do this would be through the inclusion of case studies based on actual past events and through illustrative projections of what climate risk might look like on the ground across the city in the future.   This section should be a springboard for the rest of the plan and should set out a clear indicative illustration of the key features which Edinburgh should aspire to as a well-adapted city in the future. It simply fails to do this and requires a thorough reworking.

Climate Ready Edinburgh Action Plan and Implementation Plan

At first sight, these plans seem thorough and comprehensive. But a closer reading reveals many points of real concern which beg the question of how real, relevant, and meaningful the content of Action Plan and Implementation Plans is. Some of the proposed actions are so broad and nebulous that they are almost meaningless.

It must be acknowledged that many of the actions listed in Implementation Plan are of value. But an overarching lack of specificity means that almost any activity, large or small, could be counted as addressing the actions listed  here.  A SMART action plan incorporates 5 characteristics of a goal: specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-based.  These characteristics are not comprehensively achieved in the draft.

We would like to see:

  • Specific actions to increase the climate resilience of city-wide built heritage
  • Greater clarity and urgency on what is being done to counter storm events and flooding
  • More specific and tangible action to  the challenges of sea-level rise
  • Specific interventions to address heat and storm event impacts on public transport, road, and active travel
  • More pro-active action to secure a biodiversity-rich future environment for Edinburgh
  • Pro-active selection of more suitable tree species to safeguard the city’s greenspace and streets
  • Early engagement with the increased day-to-day maintenance burden of greenspaces, parks, and street trees
  • Fuller articulation and stakeholder engagement on the impact of climate change on the local economy, both positive and negatively
  • A much greater degree of participation by residents and other stakeholders at an early stage of the detailed design and implementation of the proposed actions
  • An equal role for residents in the proposed review group and in the identification of key indicators of success
  • Greater transparency on which actions are fully funded and committed
  • Greater transparency on how the draft plan adds value to ongoing activities which are not directly driven by a climate adaptation agenda

Meaningful Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and Evaluation is given a passing mention in the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030   but is essentially  absent.  A draft Monitoring and Evaluation process for comprehensively assessing the performance and effectiveness of the actions contain in the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030   should have been presented as part of the current consulting  . This process must  require  the collection and objective analysis of the plan’s activities, outputs, outcomes, and impacts to determine whether the desired results have been achieved.

Monitoring and Evaluation  is essential for ensuring that actions are effective, efficient, and accountable. By monitoring and evaluating the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030, the Edinburgh Adapts Partnership  and citywide stakeholders and funders can identify successes, challenges and failures and so make informed decisions to improve future  plans, outcomes, and impacts.

There is no need to delay the presentation of  Monitoring and Evaluation framework with key measures of success for Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030. This work does not need to originated from scratch.  The largely generic content of the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030  means that similar plans with approved   Monitoring and Evaluation frameworks can readily form the basis of a suitable framework for the Edinburgh Adapts Partnership.  Presenting such a framework now, before the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030   is approved is highly desirable and will ensure timely monitoring of the plans process.

Role of Residents

We believe that residents need a much greater involvement in Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 at all levels, from governance to action on the ground. The plan and the Edinburgh Adapts Partnership should empower residents, communities, and business stakeholders  to identify climate impacts, and to discuss interventions to adapt to them. This will lead  to a better awareness of, engagement with  and preparedness for future climate change events across the city and help build a common understanding and ownership of climate adaptation plans and actions, which is key to their successful delivery. As the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030 is rolled out, inclusive community engagement should be supported. In part this might be achieved through an online community engagement platform to facilitate the review of ongoing actions and the working up of new actions. However, real world engagement is also required to access traditionally unheard voices and groups. “Think globally, act locally” was a core principle of Local Agenda 21 which aimed to inspire local authorities, their partners, and citizens to work towards sustainable development. The same principle is applicable to the Draft Climate Ready Edinburgh Plan 2024-2030.