Planning Comments
A searchable archive of the Association’s comments on and responses to various planning applications and consultations.
-
Temporary festivals accepted, but civic space pressures require tighter safeguards -
Festival role recognised, but cumulative civic space impacts require controls. -
Festival use accepted, but stronger safeguards needed for The Meadows. -
Support Fringe venue, but stronger tree and landscape safeguards needed. -
World Heritage proposals need stronger evidence, heritage assessment, and visual justification -
Improved design, but objections remain over scale, roofscape, and conservation impact -
Improved scheme, but concerns remain over scale, demolition, and design quality -
World Heritage proposals require evidence, sensitivity, and least-impact design. -
Insufficient heritage and visual evidence prevents policy-compliant assessment of proposal. -
Scaffold advert harms Princes Street’s historic character and coherence -
Objects to conversion harming heritage, residential use, community balance -
Positive shift, but design quality and place-making remain weak -
Supports continued cultural use with management of residential impacts and continued improvement -
Opposes apart-hotel; risks interiors, heritage integrity, and mixed-use balance. -
Design misalignment undermines streetscape; redevelopment principle supported
