1 Thistle Street

Posted on: July 4, 2025

The current proposals raise serious concerns

The current proposals raise serious concerns

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association objects to this application on the grounds of excessive height, poor design integration, and lack of sensitivity to the historic context of the New Town Conservation Area and World Heritage Site.

While we welcome the general ambition to upgrade and consolidate this office site, the current proposals raise serious concerns. In particular, the height and bulk of the proposed new upper levels appear overly dominant within this tight historic streetscape. Rather than enhancing the urban form, the upper storeys risk overwhelming the existing building and disrupting the established rhythm and scale of Thistle Street. We recommend that these upper elements be more carefully stepped back or reconfigured to reduce their visual impact and improve integration with the street.

The design language and materials of the proposed extensions also warrant further scrutiny. The elevations currently lack the architectural refinement and contextual referencing expected in a highly sensitive location. This is particularly concerning in relation to the adjacent listed buildings and the cumulative effect of incremental alterations on the character of the street.

We acknowledge improvements such as the removal of car parking and introduction of cycle facilities, but these benefits do not outweigh the need for a more considered architectural response. A revised scheme that moderates the upper levels and demonstrates a clearer relationship to the surrounding built heritage would be more appropriate.

Further Details Here

Back to Listings

Posted on:

The loss of the existing theatre use is unwelcome and unmitigated

The loss of the existing theatre use is unwelcome and unmitigated

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association recognises the value of bringing this long-vacant, Category B-listed building back into active use, and we accept that a hotel conversion may be appropriate in principle at this central location. However, we object to the current proposal on several significant grounds.

This scheme would entail the complete removal of the building’s surviving historic internal features, including the chapel-style auditorium structure, balcony arrangement, and original architectural detailing. These elements form a critical part of the building’s listed status and cultural significance, not merely its external sandstone façade. Retaining only the outer walls offers a lesser conservation benefit and contributes to a broader trend of façade-only preservation in the city, which the Cockburn Association has consistently opposed. This practice results in the irreversible loss of interior heritage, especially within sensitive areas such as the New Town Conservation Area and World Heritage Site.

Moreover, the loss of the existing theatre use is unwelcome and unmitigated. The Rose Theatre is one of the few remaining independent performance venues in Edinburgh’s city centre and has supported local and festival-related programming. Its conversion to a hotel, even with a rooftop bar and café, would result in the permanent loss of a valuable cultural space at a time when such infrastructure is increasingly under pressure. This undermines Edinburgh’s international reputation as a festival city.

We are further concerned by the absence of a Heritage Statement or a conservation-led approach to the building’s interior, particularly given its listed status and prominent location. We urge the applicant and the planning authority to explore revised proposals that retain or meaningfully integrate a cultural function and demonstrate a commitment to preserving both external and internal heritage in line with city policy and conservation best practice.

Further Details Here

Back to Listings

Leith Walk Apart-Hotel

Posted on:

We encourage consideration of alternative uses

We encourage consideration of alternative uses

Cockburn Response

We support the principle of redeveloping this long-vacant site, which currently detracts from the vitality of Leith Walk. However, we object to the current proposal on the grounds of excessive height and massing, which risks compromising daylight, privacy, and residential amenity for neighbouring properties. We urge reconsideration of the scale and setbacks to better integrate the scheme into its context.

Given the site’s close proximity to homes and restricted access routes, robust safeguards are needed, specifically a noise control strategy, clear guest management plan, and ongoing monitoring of potential disturbance. The current design also lacks distinction and must be strengthened to reflect the architectural quality appropriate for a site near a conservation area. Finally, we encourage consideration of alternative uses, including affordable housing, which may better meet local needs in this location.

Further Details Here

Back to Listings

Albany Street Hotel

Posted on:

The site is situated within a highly sensitive heritage context

The site is situated within a highly sensitive heritage context

Cockburn Response

We note the proposed change of use from office to hotel at 58 Albany Street, located within the New Town Conservation Area and the Edinburgh World Heritage Site buffer zone.  The site is situated within a highly sensitive heritage context, surrounded by numerous Category A and B listed buildings, predominantly Georgian townhouses on Albany Street and tenements on Broughton Street. The area supports a diverse mix of commercial, hospitality, and residential uses.

In principle, we recognise the potential for a well-managed, small-scale hotel to contribute positively to the mixed-use character of this part of the city centre, provided that the historic fabric is respected and operational impacts are carefully controlled.

The proposed works, including re-roofing and internal alterations, should be assessed in accordance with national and local heritage policy to ensure the integrity and legibility of nearby listed buildings are conserved. Particular attention should be paid to signage design, any new signage must be of high quality, appropriately scaled, and sensitive to the architectural character of the street.

Given the relatively narrow and largely residential nature of Albany Street, we emphasise the need for clear planning conditions regarding servicing, deliveries, and guest drop-offs. In particular, the potential impact of taxi or coach traffic on congestion and residential amenity must be addressed. A robust management plan covering traffic, guest arrival, and waste handling should be secured to avoid adverse effects on neighbouring properties and the surrounding streetscape.

We offer no objection in principle, but request that the issues outlined above be addressed through detailed planning conditions, design refinement, and operational oversight to ensure a respectful and sustainable addition to the historic fabric of the New Town.

Further Details Here

Back to Listings

Ratcliffe Terrace PBSA

Posted on:

The design lacks architectural distinction and fails to respond meaningfully to its setting

The design lacks architectural distinction and fails to respond meaningfully to its setting

Cockburn Response

We object to planning application 25/02904/FUL on the grounds that it appears to fails to comply with key policies in the City Plan and NPF4.

While the site is appropriate for redevelopment in principle, the proposal’s excessive scale, poor design quality, and loss of distinctive existing buildings raise serious concerns. The five-storey frontage block is too tall for its context, and the overall massing, especially in conjunction with adjacent proposals, risks overwhelming the surrounding townscape and conservation areas.

The design lacks architectural distinction and fails to respond meaningfully to its setting. Internally, the proposed rooms require careful assessment with respect to daylighting standards, and external amenity space is limited and heavily overshadowed.

Despite some sustainability features, there is insufficient detail on long-term drainage, biodiversity, or maintenance. In addition, the continued expansion of purpose-built student accommodation in this area also lacks a robust, up-to-date student needs assessment and risks damaging the local housing mix and community balance. In our view, this is a missed opportunity for a more sensitive and contextually appropriate scheme, and we urge refusal of the application in its current form.

Further Details Here

Back to Listings

21 George Iv Bridge

Posted on: June 20, 2025

This property holds a unique and globally recognised place in contemporary literary history

This property holds a unique and globally recognised place in contemporary literary history

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association wishes to express its support for this planning application relating to the restoration and future use of the Elephant House café on George IV Bridge.

This property holds a unique and globally recognised place in contemporary literary history, widely known as one of the formative writing spaces for J.K. Rowling during the early development of the Harry Potter series. As such, it continues to serve as a point of cultural interest and a destination for literary tourism, attracting visitors from around the world.

The Elephant House was among several properties badly damaged in the devastating fire that occurred in August 2021. We welcome efforts to bring this well-known site back into public use, recognising the significant role it plays in both Edinburgh’s living literary heritage and the broader visitor economy.

We support proposals that aim to sensitively restore the premises, ensuring the building’s cultural associations are respected and its contribution to the city’s rich literary landscape is preserved and enhanced.

Further Details Here

Back to Listings

Millbank Pavilion A, B Astley Ainslie Hospital

Posted on: June 18, 2025

A modest but historically and socially significant structure

A modest but historically and socially significant structure

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association objects to the proposed demolition of the Millbank Pavilion, a modest but historically and socially significant structure built in 1928 as a convalescent ward for tuberculosis patients. Although the building is not statutorily listed, it forms an important part of the architectural and landscape character of the wider Astley Ainslie Hospital site, which sits within the Grange Conservation Area and carries a strong association with Edinburgh’s healthcare and civic heritage.

This application must be assessed in light of Policy ENV 2 of the adopted Edinburgh Local Development Plan, which states that proposals involving demolition in a conservation area will not be permitted unless it can be clearly demonstrated that:

  • The building is of no architectural or historic interest;
  • The structural condition rules out retention at reasonable cost;
  • The demolition is essential to delivering significant public benefits; and
  • Any replacement will preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the area.

In our view, the current application does not meet these tests. The building’s original function and surviving form offer tangible links to Edinburgh’s public health legacy. Its retention was specifically identified in both the City of Edinburgh Council’s Place Brief (2020) and the Astley Ainslie Community Trust’s feasibility study as a strong candidate for sensitive conversion—demonstrating clear potential for reuse. The justification presented, citing asbestos and structural issues, appears inconsistent with this recent guidance and lacks transparent, conservation-led assessment.

Moreover, determining the fate of individual buildings on the site in advance of an approved, comprehensive masterplan or Local Place Plan is premature. This piecemeal approach risks eroding the integrity of the site’s historic environment and undermining meaningful community-led development. We urge the Council to uphold its commitment to plan-led, participatory regeneration, particularly on a site of such long-standing civic importance.

The demolition of the Millbank Pavilion would represent an unnecessary and irreversible loss of Edinburgh’s built heritage, setting an unfortunate precedent for further erosion of valued historic fabric. We therefore recommend refusal of this application, and call instead for proper heritage appraisal, sustainability analysis, and engagement with the community to explore viable alternatives.

Further Details Here

Back to Listings

Gorgie Road – temporary residential

Posted on: June 12, 2025

Our objection is based on the lack of essential detail in the application

Our objection is based on the lack of essential detail in the application

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association fully acknowledges the urgent need to address Edinburgh’s housing emergency and supports efforts of the City of Edinburgh Council and other providers to provide solutions for those in urgent need of suitable residential accommodation. However, we object to the current planning application for the change of use from student accommodation to temporary residential accommodation at 555 Gorgie Road.

Our objection is based on the lack of essential detail in the application, which prevents a meaningful assessment of the suitability of this building for longer term residential use.

Specifically, the application does not clarify if acceptable space standards for residential use are present or can be achieved, there is no detail given of management and servicing arrangements, no detail of the amenities to be made available to residents, and no detail given of the actual or potential impacts of this proposal on the local community. Supporting documents such as a transport assessment should also be provided. These are critical omissions that make it impossible to determine whether or not the proposed development meets the needs of potential residents and integrates appropriately with the surrounding area and community.

We request that the application be withdrawn and resubmitted only when these key details are included to enable a thorough and transparent evaluation. This will ensure that any development aligns with the needs of both residents and the wider community while addressing the housing crisis effectively.

Further Details Here

Back to Listings

Western Harbour

Posted on: June 4, 2025

A community campaign has sought the retention of existing ponds

A community campaign has sought the retention of existing ponds

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association has submitted an objection to planning application 25/01762/FUL for 154 new apartments at Western Harbour. While we recognise the urgent need for new homes in Edinburgh and welcome residential development in principle, this proposal fails to demonstrate the design ambition or contextual sensitivity expected at such a prominent waterfront location.

The architectural design and overall site layout are disappointing, with little evident effort to engage meaningfully with the site’s maritime character. The buildings appear generic in form and do not respond to the opportunity presented by the waterfront setting.

Of particular concern is the treatment of the existing water features. Despite a long-running community campaign to retain and protect the established ponds and surrounding habitat, now home to a wide range of wildlife, this application offers little clarity on how the surviving feature will be sensitively integrated into the wider development. The absence of a clear landscape or ecological framework is a missed opportunity and weakens the wider masterplan.

We urge the applicant and planners to reconsider the quality, sustainability, and contextual response of the proposals—ensuring that any new development adds lasting value to Edinburgh’s waterfront and reflects community expectations.

Further Details Here

Back to Listings

Capital House

Posted on: May 29, 2025

Using Lothian Road for servicing presents some challenges

Using Lothian Road for servicing presents some challenges

Cockburn Response

The Association has considered this proposal repurpose Capital House as a hotel. We have met with the developer and discuss the scheme with them and their proposal advisors.

Firstly, we have no objection to the proposed change of use. Capital House was built in the 1980s and is now not deemed suitable for commercial market. Its structure and internal arrangements mean that structural alterations will be kept to a minimum and therefore make good use of the embedded carbon in the building.

We have no objection to the proposed extension to the western section of the building. It is largely hidden from view and although visible from vantage points with Edinburgh Castle, it’s impact will be minimal.

The Association strongly advises that this development proposal to used to help alleviate the significant deficiencies of Festival Square. This civic space has never been successful as the buildings which define its edges do not integrate and aminate it. The use of the ground floor as hotel bar/restaurant provides this opportunity. We therefore strongly recommend that the City Council as owners of the Festival Square work with the developers to open up the ground floor allowing external seating, etc. The current drop from Lothian Road to the Square in this location provides an exciting opportunity.

We would also recommend discussions with the neighbouring Filmhouse. A direct link to the hospitality spaces could be beneficial to both operations.

Finally, the Association suggests that adequate conditions be attached to address servicing and delivery issues. Using Lothian Road for servicing presents some challenges, especially in the context of Future Streets proposals.

Further Details Here

Back to Listings