Edinburgh Festival Fringe 2023 venue: George Square

Posted on: May 12, 2023

The absence of a tree protection plan to secure the long-term health of the site’s trees is simply unacceptable.

The absence of a tree protection plan to secure the long-term health of the site’s trees is simply unacceptable.

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association OBJECTS to this application.

The Cockburn Association has considered plans for the use of the George Square Gardens as a Fringe venue by Underbelly Ltd. We acknowledge the fact that similar infrastructure has been erected on this site in previous years. We also acknowledge that George Square Gardens in not a publicly-owned open space per se but it does function of one.    

This application lacks tree protection and monitoring plan. Issues relating to tree protection and tree health in relation to the use of George Square as an event space have been consistently flagged up by concerned stakeholders, including the Cockburn Association.  The absence of a tree protection plan to secure the long-term health of the site’s trees is simply unacceptable.

The Cockburn has advocated that soft surfaced areas such as parks and gardens should not be used for infrastructure-heavy events due to the damage they cause to the ground and to the loss of essential public amenity space, even for relatively short periods of time.

Local Development Plan Policy ENV12 on Trees states “Development will not be permitted if likely to have a damaging impact on a tree protected by a Tree Preservation Order or on any other tree or woodland worthy of retention unless necessary for good arboricultural reasons. Where such permission is granted, replacement planting of appropriate species and numbers will be required to offset the loss to amenity.”  The proposed development is likely to have a damaging impact on the root systems of trees in the Square and is therefore inconsistent with this policy.   

None of trees along the perimeter of the gardens are proposed for a protection zone despite the very heavy and damaging infrastructure proposed, which included chiller units, water tanks, toilets, site cabins, etc.  

The Cockburn strongly advises that all trees are properly protected from damage and root compression and the applicant must submit a tree protection plan to this effective.   

We can see no plausible reason why most of the infrastructure could not be placed around the Square.  This would reduce the impact on the soft-surfaces and trees in the Square considerably.  

As such, we advocate amendments before this application can be acceptable.  Specifically, tree protection arrangements for all trees and not just those in the middle section of the gardens; removal of ancillary infrastructure from the gardens to the hardstanding area surrounding the gardens. Also, we advise that consent be given for one year only, with suitable monitoring arrangements in place to ensure the long-term health of trees in George Square Gardens.

At the Culture and Communities Committee on 11th May 2023 additional protection and monitoring was secured for trees in relation to the events taking place in Princes Street Gardens.  We would encourage the city of Edinburgh Council to promote similar protection and monitoring regime for events in all situations where trees are present.

Edinburgh has an ambitious target to become a Million Tree City by 2030 as part of its commitment to be net zero by the end of the decade.  The meaningful and effective protection of the city’s mature trees must be a major part of this commitment. Our mature trees currently provide invaluable well-being and ecological benefits but these benefits cannot be taken for granted.

 

Proposed 5G telecoms installation, Whitehouse Loan

Posted on:

The proposed telecommunications equipment would result in excessive visual and physical clutter within the streetscape and would be detrimental to the character of a a Conservation Area

The proposed telecommunications equipment would result in excessive visual and physical clutter within the streetscape and would be detrimental to the character of a a Conservation Area

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn OBJECTS to this application.

The proposed telecommunications equipment would result in excessive visual and physical clutter within the streetscape and would be detrimental to the Merchiston and Greenhill Conservation Area.

The proposal would have a harmful impact upon the visual quality of the wider street scene and so detract from the amenity and special character of the conservation area and from residential amenity. It is our view that the application is not consistent with Policy Env 6 Conservation Areas – Development as it does not preserve or enhance the special character or appearance of the conservation area.

This site is close to a number of Listed Buildings. It is our view that the application is not consistent with   Policy ENV3 – Listed Buildings which indicates that development within the curtilage or affecting the setting of a listed building will be permitted only if not detrimental to the appearance or character of the building, or to its setting

In addition, this proposal will add street clutter to a relatively narrow pavement close busy road junctions. This area of the city hosts several educational establishments, and this fact heightens the need to keep pavements as clear and unobstructed as possible.

We also note the recent refusal of a similar application 22/04200/FUL further north on Whitehouse Loan, opposite No 108. This was for a mast 16m high (i.e. shorter than the 20m proposed for this site opposite No 171). In its Handling Report, explaining the refusal, the Case Officer wrote: “The development would disrupt the settled and mature character of the immediate vicinity, which is heavily influenced by soft landscaping and buildings formed in traditional and natural materials. It would erode the historic quality of the streetscape, to the detriment of the character and appearance of the conservation area. “The proposal would have an adverse effect on the character and appearance of the conservation area and is unacceptable, having regard to Section 64 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997.”

This application should certainly be refused if it is determined that the benefits of the proposed installation are deemed not to outweigh the harm caused to the conservation area and setting of Listed Buildings and if there is insufficient evidence that alternative sites or mast sharing opportunities have been adequately explored.

We understand the essential requirement for modern telecommunications infrastructure in our city and its importance to residents. However, we believe that, in consultation with local stakeholders, the proposed apparatus should be located in a more inconspicuous location or disaggregated into smaller, less conspicuous arrays if this is achievable.

Cockburn Association appoints its first woman Chair of Council

POSTED ON May 11, 2023 BY James Garry

After 148 years as Edinburgh’s leading civic organisation, the Cockburn Association has appointed a woman to be its Chair

After 148 years as Edinburgh’s leading civic organisation, the Cockburn Association has appointed a woman to be its Chair

Support the Cockburn

Donate
Join Us

Holyrood Family Adventure

Mon, 29 May 2023

Discover more about Holyrood’s wildlife, history and volcanic landscape with these fun, family-friendly activities for children 5 and up.

Book Here

Edinburgh Climate Movement Gathering

Sun, 30 Apr 2023

A relaxed afternoon and evening of workshops, performances and food to connect and strengthen the movement for climate justice.

Book Here

The Cockburn Association 148th Annual General Meeting

POSTED ON April 21, 2023

The Cockburn Association warmly invites all of its members to attend our 148th Annual General Meeting.

The Cockburn Association warmly invites all of its members to attend our 148th Annual General Meeting.

Support the Cockburn

Donate
Join Us

The Cockburn Association 148th Annual General Meeting

Thu, 18 May 2023

The Cockburn Association warmly invites all of its members to attend our 148th Annual General Meeting.

Book Here

The Patrick Geddes India Scotland Talks

Thu, 4 May 2023

An exciting free public event presenting guest speakers from India, France and Scotland

Book Here

Climate Vulnerability Index (CVI) Assessment for the Old and New Towns of Edinburgh

POSTED ON  BY James Garry

Climate change is the fastest growing threat to
World Heritage (WH)

Climate change is the fastest growing threat to
World Heritage (WH)

Support the Cockburn

Donate
Join Us

Johnston Terrace Monopole

Posted on: April 20, 2023

The proposed Old Town location for this 17m high telecommunications monopole is unacceptable. 

The proposed Old Town location for this 17m high telecommunications monopole is unacceptable. 

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn objects to this application.  The proposed Old Town location for this 17m high telecommunications monopole is unacceptable. 

It will inevitably have significant and negative impacts on views to and from Edinburgh Castle and the Old Town.  The Castle is one of Edinburgh and Scotland’s most historic and iconic heritage sites and tourist destinations.  It is the subject of multiple heritage designations to conserve and protect its fabric and its setting. The Old Town Conservation Area forms part of the Old and New Towns of Edinburgh World Heritage Site which was inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage Site list in 1995.   The Old Town Conservation Area Character Appraisal states that: “A key element in giving Edinburgh its world – wide identity is the perception of the Old Town in approaches to the city. The topography of the Old Town makes it both very visible and provides a wide range of dramatic views. The Castle and the Old Town ridge dominate the Edinburgh skyline, not just from the present day city boundaries, but also in many more distant views and approaches to the city”.

In addition, this proposal will add street clutter to a busy pedestrian and vehicular thoroughfare subject to heavy tourist-related and residential usage at most times of the year. This fact heightens the need to keep pavements as clear and unobstructed as possible in and around this location.

This application should certainly be refused if it is determined that the benefits of the proposed installation are deemed not to outweigh the harm caused to the Old Town Conservation Area and to Edinburgh Castle and if there is insufficient evidence that alternative sites or mast sharing opportunities have been adequately explored. 

We understand the essential requirement for modern telecommunications infrastructure in our city and its importance to residents, visitors and businesses. However, we believe that, in consultation with local stakeholders, the proposed apparatus should be located in a more inconspicuous location or disaggregated into smaller, less conspicuous arrays if this is achievable.

Monday Matters: David McCrone ‘Who Runs Edinburgh?’

15th May 2023

‘Who Runs Edinburgh?’ looks behind the Edinburgh façade of tourism and festivals Focuses on power and status in the city .

Book Here