Discover Dean Village Tour

Thu 16 Jul • 6:30 PM

The hidden gems & fascinating history of this charming village

Book Here

People and Places: Discovering Medieval Edinburgh

Sat, 13 Jun 2026, 13:30

Walk fifteenth-century Edinburgh: streets, stories and Trinity’s lost world

Book Here

Scents, Sights and Sounds: Experiencing the Trinity

Sat, 30 May 2026, 13:30

Step into fifteenth-century Edinburgh: Trinity Church in splendour and significance

Book Here

Building for the Future We Say We Want

POSTED ON May 22, 2026 BY James Garry

Hammarby Sjöstad: on closing the gap between what plans say and what buildings deliver

Hammarby Sjöstad: on closing the gap between what plans say and what buildings deliver

Support the Cockburn

Donate
Join Us

Reid Quad / Teviot Place

Posted on: May 21, 2026

Temporary festivals accepted, but civic space pressures require tighter safeguards

Temporary festivals accepted, but civic space pressures require tighter safeguards

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association does not object in principle to temporary Fringe-related use in this location.

However, while the application address refers to Bristo Square, the site lies within the Reid Quad / Teviot Place forecourt, where it plays a critical role in the setting, movement and functioning of the surrounding civic environment.

The application seeks permission over a three-year period, from 2026 to 2028. In a space of this sensitivity, this raises particular concerns.

The proposal, as submitted, does not yet demonstrate thatcumulative impacts will be adequately controlled over time

  • sufficient flexibility exists to respond to year-on-year variation
  • the space will retain its role as an open and permeable transitional environment
  • the balance between civic space and managed commercial event space will be appropriately maintained
  • climate mitigation, waste, surface protection, servicing and public realm resilience have been adequately addressed
  • the proposal satisfies the place-making expectations of NPF4 Policy 14 and relevant City Plan 2030 policies

Support could only be contemplated if:

  • the scale and layout are demonstrably reduced to retain meaningful open and transitional space
  • robust and enforceable crowd, noise, waste, servicing and surface-protection measures are secured
  • permission is strictly limited to a single festival season, subject to annual review
  • clear safeguards are secured to protect informal public access, pedestrian movement and civic character
  • the applicant provides clearer commitments on climate mitigation, material reuse, reinstatement and public realm resilience

Should the application proceed with multi-year consent, expand its footprint, or fail to secure enforceable operational controls, the Cockburn Association would have significant concerns and may object to this or future proposals.

Bristo Square

Posted on:

Festival role recognised, but cumulative civic space impacts require controls.

Festival role recognised, but cumulative civic space impacts require controls.

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association recognises the longstanding role of festival activity within Bristo Square and the wider cultural importance of Edinburgh’s summer festivals. Temporary cultural uses in this location are well established and contribute significantly to the city’s international identity and economy.

However, the Association remains concerned by the continuing intensification and cumulative spread of large-scale temporary festival infrastructure within sensitive civic and historic spaces. While the current proposal may be acceptable in principle as a temporary intervention, it also reflects the growing normalisation of substantial commercial occupation and enclosure of important public realm areas.

The proposal should therefore be subject to particularly robust controls relating to duration, scale, servicing, cleansing, noise management, reinstatement and protection of the public realm. Care should be taken to minimise visual clutter, protect paving and landscape features, and maintain pedestrian permeability and civic legibility throughout the operational period.

Given the cumulative pressures already experienced across central Edinburgh during the festival season, the Association would strongly favour consent being limited to a single festival season rather than multi-year approval, in order to allow regular reassessment of impacts and operational management.

On balance, the Cockburn Association submits a planning comment rather than a formal objection. While temporary festival use in this location is accepted in principle, the cumulative impact on civic space, townscape character and public realm quality remains a significant concern requiring ongoing scrutiny and careful management.

Edinburgh’s First Medical Officer of Health

Thu 28 May: 2:30pm

Explore Sir Henry Littlejohn’s lasting legacy in Edinburgh

Book Here

Rhind Lectures 2026 (in person and online)

Friday, June 19-Sunday, June 21

Exploring Scottish martial identity, representation, and memory, 1793–1815.

Book Here

Middle Meadow Walk

Posted on: May 20, 2026

Festival use accepted, but stronger safeguards needed for The Meadows.

Festival use accepted, but stronger safeguards needed for The Meadows.

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association accepts the principle of a temporary Fringe venue at Middle Meadow Walk, recognising its contribution to Edinburgh’s cultural life and the wider Festival.

However, The Meadows is a highly sensitive and intensively used public green space, and proposals must demonstrate that temporary use does not result in long-term environmental or landscape harm.

In its current form, the application raises concerns regarding:

  • the protection of trees and landscape features
  • the cumulative impact on The Meadows
  • the appropriateness of any permission extending beyond a single festival season
  • the lack of clear, enforceable safeguards for ground and landscape protectio
  •  insufficient evidence that climate mitigation, green-space resilience and restoration have been properly addressed

Support could only be contemplated if a robust Tree and Ground Protection Plan is secured by condition or prior approval

  • permission is limited to a single year, subject to revie
  • clear limits on scale, layout and duration of occupation are defined and enforced
  • post-event monitoring and reinstatement requirements are secured
  • a clear landscape restoration and climate-resilience strategy is provided

Without these safeguards, the application does not adequately protect the long-term character, condition, climate-resilience function and public value of The Meadows, and should not be supported in its current form.

George Square Gardens

Posted on:

Support Fringe venue, but stronger tree and landscape safeguards needed.

Support Fringe venue, but stronger tree and landscape safeguards needed.

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association accepts the principle of a temporary Fringe venue at George Square, recognising its long-established role within the Edinburgh Festival Fringe and its contribution to the city’s cultural life.

However, this is a highly sensitive landscaped site, and proposals must demonstrate clear and robust safeguards to ensure that temporary use does not result in long-term environmental or townscape harm.

In its current form, the application is deficient in key respects. In particular:the absence of a Tree Protection Plan and arboricultural method statement is a significant omission

  • the proposed three-year permission is not justified, given the sensitivity of the site and the lack of supporting safeguards
  • the application does not yet demonstrate sufficient compliance with policy expectations relating to trees, biodiversity, amenity, landscape protection and climate resilience

These are not minor matters, but fundamental requirements for the proper assessment and management of development in this location.

The Association therefore recommends that the planning authority should not support the application as submitted, unless, as a minimum, the following are secured:

  • submission and approval of a Tree Protection Plan and arboricultural method statement
  • clear mitigation, monitoring and restoration arrangements for soil, trees, drainage and landscape condition
  • limitation of any consent to a single year, subject to review and monitoring