Proposed 5G telecoms installation, Whitehouse Loan
Posted on: November 11, 2022
The proposed telecommunications equipment would result in excessive visual and physical clutter within the streetscape and would be detrimental to the setting of a Listed Building
Address: 51 Whitehouse Loan Edinburgh
Proposal: Proposed Telecoms Apparatus 45 Meters South of 51 Whitehouse Loan Edinburgh
Ref No: 22/05042/FUL
Closing date for comments: Fri 18 Nov 2022
Determination date: Mon 05 Dec 2022
Result: Pending
Cockburn Response
The Cockburn OBJECTS to this application.
This application has been brought to the Cockburn’s attention by concerned local stakeholders. The proposed telecommunications equipment would result in excessive visual and physical clutter within the streetscape and would be detrimental to the setting of a Listed Building
The proposal would have a harmful impact upon the visual quality of the wider street scene and so detract from the amenity and special character of the conservation area and from residential amenity. It is our view that the application is not consistent with Policy Env 6 Conservation Areas – Development as it does not preserve or enhance the special character or appearance of the conservation area.
The proposal would have a harmful impact on the setting of a Listed Building. The proposed location is immediately adjacent to the main gateway to Bruntsfield House, which forms part of the A-listing for the site. It is our view that the application is not consistent with Policy ENV3 – Listed Buildings which indicates that development within the curtilage or affecting the setting of a listed building will be permitted only if not detrimental to the appearance or character of the building, or to its setting
In addition, this proposal will add street clutter to a relatively narrow pavement close busy road junctions. This area of the city hosts a number of educational establishments, and this fact heightens the need to keep pavements as clear and unobstructed as possible.
This application should certainly be refused if it is determined that the benefits of the proposed installation are deemed not to outweigh the harm caused to the conservation area and setting of a Listed Building and if there is insufficient evidence that alternative sites or mast sharing opportunities have been adequately explored.
We understand the essential requirement for modern telecommunications infrastructure in our city and its importance to residents. However, we believe that, in consultation with local stakeholders, the proposed apparatus should be located in a more inconspicuous location or disaggregated into smaller, less conspicuous arrays if this is achievable.