Hutton in Edinburgh

Tue 7 – Thu 9 Apr 2026

Step into the 1700s and walk through Edinburgh’s landscape with philosopher James Hutton

Book Here

North Edinburgh Connections: A Chance to Get Street Design Right

POSTED ON March 19, 2026 BY James Garry

Streets as civic spaces, not just routes for movement

Streets as civic spaces, not just routes for movement

Support the Cockburn

Donate
Join Us

Preserving Digital Cultural Heritage

Wed, Mar 25

Digital archives, bias, and challenges preserving recent cultural heritage

Book Here

Remembering the Reformation

Mon, Mar 30

Reformation memory, transformation, and cultural legacy explored through history

Book Here

Leith Theatre Spring Heritage Tour

Thursday, Apr 16

Behind-the-scenes tour of historic Thomas Morton Hall venue

Book Here

Expressing Scotland: Holding the Intangible

Friday, Mar 20

Exploring intangible heritage, archives, and community culture in Scotland

Book Here

Heritage Works – Arts, Culture and Placemaking in a Historic City

Tue, Mar 24, 2026 • 9:30

Heritage, culture and placemaking shaping resilient Scottish urban futures

Book Here

Forth Street Apart-Hotel

Posted on: March 17, 2026

Opposes apart-hotel; risks interiors, heritage integrity, and mixed-use balance.

Opposes apart-hotel; risks interiors, heritage integrity, and mixed-use balance.

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association objects to the proposed conversion of 16–26 Forth Street from office use to a large apart-hotel.

While the continued repair and reuse of historic buildings is welcome in principle, the scale and intensity of the proposed development raise significant concerns. The level of internal subdivision required to create approximately ninety visitor accommodation units risks undermining the spatial character and architectural integrity of the listed Georgian interiors.

Concerns also arise regarding the design and scale of the proposed rear extension within the courtyard environment, which must remain clearly subordinate to the historic terrace.

More broadly, the proposal contributes to an increasing pattern of converting buildings within the city centre to visitor accommodation. While tourism is an important part of Edinburgh’s economy, the cumulative loss of employment and mixed-use functions risks undermining the balanced character of the New Town.

For these reasons, the Cockburn Association objects to the proposal and encourages the planning authority to carefully consider both the heritage impacts and the cumulative effects of visitor accommodation within this historic area.

 

Planning for the Future: What Edinburgh Can Learn from China (and Vice Versa)

POSTED ON March 13, 2026 BY James Garry

What Edinburgh and China can learn from each other

What Edinburgh and China can learn from each other

Support the Cockburn

Donate
Join Us

Robertson Avenue student residential development

Posted on:

Design misalignment undermines streetscape; redevelopment principle supported

Design misalignment undermines streetscape; redevelopment principle supported

Cockburn Response

The Cockburn Association supports the principle of redeveloping this long-vacant site and recognises the potential for the proposal to repair the Robertson Avenue streetscape.  However, the Association objects to the proposal in its current form.

The architectural elevation does not adequately align with the roofline and horizontal string courses of the adjoining traditional tenement, resulting in an unsatisfactory relationship with the established streetscape. A revised design aligning façade elements with neighbouring architectural datum lines would significantly improve contextual integration.

Clarification is also required regarding:

  • the extent of ground-floor activation and the development’s contribution to the street environment;
  • the building’s capacity to be adapted to mainstream residential use in future.

The Association also reiterates its concern regarding the cumulative concentration of PBSA within the Gorgie and Dalry corridor. While modest in scale individually, such developments may collectively undermine balanced communities if not carefully managed.

A revised design addressing the issues identified above would significantly improve the proposal’s relationship with its context and its contribution to the wider neighbourhood.